Thread: Rush Limbaugh
View Single Post
  #326  
Old 10-16-2007, 12:52 AM
cmac2012's Avatar
cmac2012 cmac2012 is online now
Me, Myself, and I
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 39,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
Some, of whom later turned-out to be bogus or exaggerated their involvement in Viet Nam), they offer no proof other than their weepy words.

In neither case did people who should have been very skeptical, embrace skepticism. Instead, they embraced what they believed to be true, despite lack of conclusive evidence.
Your proof, your evidence that they were bogus or prevaricators is based entirely on Burkett, whose very words indict him as an exaggerator and evader of the truth?? Is that what I'm getting here?
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K
Reply With Quote