so Im no chemist but this isnt completely a perpetual motion machine scheme is it? What about the gobs of energy being sent out of the tail pipe? At best the comustion process is 20-30% efficient for moving the car, what about all of that lost heat energy? If that lost energy in the form of heat could be used to make H and O to increase the efficiency of the engine from 25% to 35% say, wouldnt that give you a huge net milage increase?

__________________

1982 300CD Turbo (Otis, "ups & downs") parts for sale
2003 TJ with Hemi (to go anywhere, quickly) sold
2001 Excursion Powerstroke (to go dependably)
1970 Mustang 428SCJ (to go fast)
1962 Corvette LS1 (to go in style)
2001 Schwinn Grape Krate 10spd (if all else fails)