Quote:
Originally Posted by kerry
...The study I was referring to on student evaluations was not done by Hustler or Playboy but academic education theorists trying to understand student evaluations.
|
I was kidding about the Hustler/Playboy thing, but the evaluations being commented on as to
why the answers were given, and the supposition that it was, probably, due to students/teachers sharing horizontal sleeping spaces is just that...supposition.
No study could possibly be done (College Kids vs. truthfull answers about sexual bravado? Yeah, right!) to determine what was going on in the minds of the queried...so, all you have is a bunch of academia "commenting" on why
THEY think the answers came back the way they did...
That's not a study or evidence for attractiveness/good-grades vs. butt-ugly/barely-passing.
If anything, you have a bunch of kids "horn-dogging" for better grades (the sexual "bullet-proof" type of mentality) vs. the "horn-dogging" menopausal instructors.
Two sad groups groping for grades or for sexual gratification.
Both deserve each other...
BUT, as for <18yos? VERBOTTEN! (Hey, La Ronda! sp?)
