View Single Post
  #19  
Old 01-29-2008, 04:26 PM
thesst's Avatar
thesst thesst is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ellensburg, WA
Posts: 470
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyrick View Post
That is a very common misconception. Polymerization is a fairly complex reaction involving FFA's, oxygen, heat, a catalyst (steel and copper being the best), and time. SVO is not completely without FFA's and will polymerize given the right conditions. The few actual documented tests comparing different fuels produced mixed results. Cutting with D2 will at best slow the process down to a negligable rate.

An actual document test can be found here(pdf).
You are correct that SVO CAN cause polymerization. But it is an EXTREMELY slow process. Slowing the process of polymerization to a "negligible" rate by cutting with diesel is exactly what is wanted. This is the report I was referring to: Polymerization Report.

As to cutting with RUG vs. D2: either will work, BUT: D2 naturally mixes much better into the VO just putting it into the tank (this can be shown by taking samples from your tank). RUG you will need to THOROUGHLY premix before adding to the tank. This alone makes D2 a more desirable mixer than RUG.
__________________
'79 300SD
'82 Chevy Chevette diesel
Reply With Quote