Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim B.
|
I don't believe that the "I got here first!" rule applies, so therefore, I believe that the vehicle, on the left at the intersection, should have yielded the right of way...regardless of the lights' condition(s) - since BOTH directions were showing something that was not possible (green) and both drivers should have been exercising due caution (due to the weather conditions as stated)...the intersection should then be treated as if it were a 4-Way Stop.
If we were to assign blame in the crash, the scale is tipped to the favor of the vehicle that hit by the non-yielding vehicle.
As to the other details...I'd apply a little "Saul" logic and;
#1.) Have a DA, from another county, investigate and prosecute the public entity that should have been correcting the "light situation" to begin with...then, as a judge from that accident's district, recuse oneself and assign the case to another judge from a different district...
#2.) Take driver one and fine him for speeding and causing an accident - penalties to take into account the severities of the damages/injuries;
#3.) Take driver two and fine him for OUI and causing an accident - likewise, penalties to take into account the severities of the damages/injuries...
Do I win a "sheepskin?"