Originally Posted by alamostation

No! You failed miserably.

1. It is very difficult to successfully sue a municipality and collect a judgment. Therefore, suit must be filed by both drivers against General Electric (the maker of the light bulbs in the signal) which has lots of money.

2. The car involved was patently dangerous since it was capable of exceeding the speed limit. Suit must be brought against the manufacturer of the car, the maker of the tires and any facility where maintenance was performed.

3. Coors-Molson obviously knew that their product could be consumed by someone who might drive. The beer can did not have a warning not to drive in storms printed on it. Don't forget to include the beer distributor as a defendant.