His opinion of me:


"As poorly qualified as I am to create a world in which solipsism, immoralism, and Lysenkoism are all but forgotten, I hope you will bear with me while I begin this sincere and earnest attempt. And please don't get mad with me if, in doing so, I must improve the living conditions of the most vulnerable in our society -- the sick, the old, the disabled, the unemployed, and our youth -- all of whose lives are made miserable by Whiskeydan. In the rest of this letter, I will use history and science (in the Hegelian sense) to prove that Whiskeydan's latest "revelation" (really, hallucination) is that principles don't matter. Just because I understand his beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments) doesn't mean I agree with them. His peons often reverse the normal process of interpretation. That is, they value the unsaid over the said, the obscure over the clear. Although Whiskeydan won't admit it, every time he tries, Whiskeydan gets increasingly successful in his attempts to weave his daft traits, narrow-minded obiter dicta, and detestable manuscripts into a rich tapestry that is sure to enthrone falsehood in the very center of human thought. This dangerous trend means not only death for free thought, but for imagination as well.

Whiskeydan's claim of fairness is demonstrably false. (Actually, we have a right, an indisputable, inalienable, indefeasible, divine right to take a strong position on Whiskeydan's rantings, which, after all, replace law and order with anarchy and despotism, but that's not important now.) I'll give you an example of this, based on my own experience. As you know, Whiskeydan wants to drag men out of their beds in the dead of night and castrate them. It gets better: He actually believes that flagitious tin-pot tyrants and judgmental, dim-witted slackers should rule this country. I guess no one's ever told him that griping about Whiskeydan will not make him stop trying to bring ugliness and nastiness into our lives. But even if it did, he would just find some other way to destroy the values, methods, and goals of traditional humanistic study.

Whiskeydan's platitudes cannot stand on their own merit. That's why they're dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that diseases can be defeated not through standard medical research but through the creation of a new language, one that does not stigmatize certain groups and behaviors. We don't have to stand for this! The end."