Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler
Your definition of "pounding" must be different than mine.
yes, the media did ask some tough questions, but not until the web-media outlets forced their hand. they wanted to accept all Clinton spin. Remember, that is how Matt Drudge got his start.
There is a difference between respect for the office of the President, and shilling for the President. Since every poll of news media people I have ever read flows about 90% democrat/ liberal, I do not see how anyone could think that they were even-handed. They simply do NOT keep their opinions out of the news articles. I can accept opinions on the opinion pages, but when it filters into news with judgmental adjectives being used to flavor the news, I think that is biased reporting.
The media's job is to question everything--they fail miserably. They should be reminding everyone of inconsistencies of every politician--every time they change a position. Now the news reads more like DNC talking points. My issue is that they are not "fair and balanced", while claiming to be so.
|
Well spoken.
Reminds me of the time Bill Clinton was laughing at Ron Brown's funeral wake until he saw the camera on him, then put his head down as if he were grieving.
Funny how the media quickly brushed that one aside, just as well as they brushed the whole idea of Brown's so called tragic accident aside.
How many people involved in that case commited suicide soon afterward?
They also failed to report how the .45 cal slug hole in the top of Brown's head got there along with the lead fragments.
Same with Vince Foster's so called suicide, Hillary's document removal from foster's office, Jennifer Flowers, Huanita Broderick, Rose Lawfirm document removal, wow, the media sure worked hard to bring all that to light.
Those are just a couple small examples of the crap the media concealed for the Clinton's as best as they could.
How many secret service men and state police troopers commited "suicide" after working for the Clinton's?