View Single Post
  #4  
Old 03-09-2002, 04:35 PM
Lebenz's Avatar
Lebenz Lebenz is offline
backwoods member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In the fog
Posts: 2,862
I've skied over 30 days this season, and haven’t experienced any notable power shortage from my ML. Okay it doesn’t pass quite as well as my 400e does but, shoot, most of the time is in snow country. So maybe you have a mixed agenda? Yes?

A SLK would seriously suck as a ski transport for any number of reasons, lack of storage space being probably the least of them. The amenities of the ML 55 are definitely a step up from a 320, and if you waited a little while you could get both a good deal (such as what happens when shopping for SUVs late in spring) and a Starmark warranty in addition to any remaining factory warranty. Of course if you kept the ML you have you could probably still get a SLK…

Decisions, decisions….
__________________
...Tracy

'00 ML320 "Casper"
'92 400E "Stella"

Last edited by Lebenz; 03-09-2002 at 06:33 PM.
Reply With Quote