Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler
I am not sure I accept the definition of a conservative as a promoter of the status quo. I know that is a pretty much accepted description, but I don't buy it.
In my world, a conservative is one who favors small government. Also a person inclined to self reliance, as opposed to those rely on government or a "village".
With government spending at unprecedented high levels, and with no prospects if reigning it in, A true Conservative is a basher of that status quo.
With government run ( read liberal control) of education and the disnal state of the "graduates", a Conservative is a basher of that status quo as well.
I could go on, but is it necessary? Have I demonstrated that conservative does not necessarily equal one who wants to preserve the status quo?
Maybe I am a radical conservative?
|
The people who believe as you are not, and have not been in power for over 150 years. Should by some wonderful circumstance they came to power they would most assuredly NOT be conservatives.
They would be highly radical, true liberals in the mold of Jefferson, Hamilton, Adams, Madison, Henry, and Washington, in 1775. NOT conservative at all.
B