Quote:
Originally Posted by beevly
Keep in mind that mercury, rattlesnakes, and poison ivy are all natural too.
Remember when DMSO was all the rage with the miracle-cure crowd (early 80's)? People were actually injecting that into their joints too.
|
The problem is that there is a sucker born every day. To add the word "natural" would invite them to come take a look. Like you said mercury and all that are natural. Most people equate natural with harmless.
It is an excellent paint stripper so if you have a poor paint job in your joints, you could have it cleaned out.
I think they are trying to prey on the notion that people blame the doctor for charging high fees. Most of them work for insurance companies who would save a bundle if the procedure were successful. Why wouldn't the insurance companies direct them to this procedure if it could work? If a company does something sleazy like that, can we trust any results they publish? So it was done by the University. What were the conditions of the test? Was it a FDA laboratory which follows FDA procedures? If not, why?