View Single Post
  #11  
Old 08-22-2008, 01:45 PM
dynalow's Avatar
dynalow dynalow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,599
GM's 2006 Management Report on Internal Controls

I heard about this at a seminar the other day. In essence, GM's accountants don't know WTF they are doing.

This report, now required by Sarbannes Oxley, is GM's own admission.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting of the Corporation. This system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP.

The Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Corporation; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Corporation are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Corporation; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Corporation’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in there being a more than remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. In its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, the Corporation determined that there were control deficiencies that constituted material weaknesses, as described below.

The Corporation lacked the technical expertise and processes to ensure compliance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, and did not maintain adequate controls with respect to (a) timely tax account reconciliations and analyses, (b) coordination and communication between Corporate Accounting and Tax Staffs, and (c) timely review and analysis of corporate journals recorded in the consolidation process. This material weakness resulted in a restatement of prior financial statements, as described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and, if not remediated, has the potential to cause a material misstatement in the future.

The Corporation in certain instances lacked the technical expertise and did not maintain adequate procedures to ensure that the accounting for derivative financial instruments under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, was appropriate. Procedures relating to hedging transactions in certain instances did not operate effectively to (a) properly evaluate hedge accounting treatment (b) meet the documentation requirements of SFAS No. 133, (c) adequately assess and measure hedge effectiveness on a quarterly basis, and (d) establish the appropriate communication and coordination between relevant GM departments involved in complex financial transactions. This material weakness resulted in a restatement of prior financial statements, as described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and, if not remediated, has the potential to cause a material misstatement in the future.


The Corporation did not maintain a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of technical accounting knowledge, experience, and training in the application of generally accepted accounting principles commensurate with the Corporation’s complex financial accounting and reporting requirements and low materiality thresholds. This was evidenced by a significant number of out-of-period adjustment noted during the year-end closing process. This material weakness contributed to the restatement of prior financial statements, as described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and, if not remediated, has the potential to cause a material misstatement in the future.
Due to the previously reported material weaknesses, as evidenced by the significant number and magnitude of out-of-period adjustments identified during the year-end closing process and the resulting restatements related to deferred taxes and hedging activities, management has concluded that the controls over the period-end financial reporting process were not operating effectively. Specifically, controls were not effective to ensure that significant non-routine transactions, accounting estimates, and other adjustments were appropriately reviewed, analyzed, and monitored on a timely basis.
A material weakness in the period-end financial reporting process could result in the Corporation not being able to meet its regulatory filing deadlines and, if not remediated, has the potential to cause a material misstatement or to miss a filing deadline in the future.
Management performed an assessment of the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, utilizing the criteria described in the “Internal Control – Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). The objective of this assessment was to determine whether the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2006.

Based on our assessment, and because of the material weaknesses described above, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2006.
Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the fourth quarter of 2006, GM sold a 51% interest in our wholly-owned subsidiary General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC), which is described in more detail in Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Accordingly, GMAC’s controls were not part of management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006; however, the Corporation has designed and implemented controls to ensure the appropriate recognition of equity method earnings and losses for GMAC and the effective monitoring of its investment account balance.

Certain of the personnel changes described below in “Remediation of Material Weaknesses” occurred during the fourth quarter of 2006. Other than as described above, there have not been any other changes in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2006, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.



G. Richard Wagoner
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
March 14, 2007
Frederick A. Henderson

Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer

March

http://www.gm.com/corporate/investor_information/docs/fin_data/gm06ar/content/financials/mar/mar_01.html
Reply With Quote