Quote:
Originally Posted by kerry
I wasn't intending to reply to your comment about the science curriculum. I was intending to reply to the part of your comment where you said that having students study only 'correct ideas' was similar to the Taliban.
I think curriculum decisions in science or elsewhere have to exclude certain ideas. Excluding false ideas is a pretty good criteria for determining curriculum. For instance, why not teach students that balancing the humors will cure disease in non-science classes? We don't teach it because we don't think it's true anymore. Making such a decision, on the basis of truth, is not acting like the Taliban, because the justification of the curriculum decision is not based on religious dogma but on the distinction between true and false.
|
Balancing the humors is a fine subject for history class. Or more precisely, in history of medicine at a more advanced level.
I sure as hell wouldn't suggest teaching the history of medicine and NOT include "humors" any more than I would discuss current events in civics and NOT mention Intelligent Design. Because a particular theory is inappropriate for a science class does not imply that it is inappropriate for all classes.
A teacher who would use that pedagogical approach does students no favors through censoring the bad parts.
B