Quote:
Originally Posted by G-Benz
I believe the initial goal of affirmative action was to allow underprivileged, but driven minorities access to higher education that wouldn't traditionally be available if academic performance across racial boundaries were unweighted.
But like every human assistance program (especially welfare), it has its abusers.
Also consider that the above case is no longer typical of minorities, and many have mainstreamed into suburban America, having access to the same types of advantages for success that white students enjoy.
But yeah, like others posted, my grades and test scores were exemplary, so there was no need to be considered for admission under a quota.
Should AA be removed? Probably. But mostly it should be revised, so that the pendulum doesn't swing too far the other way (as it seems to have done if you are a white candidate)...whereas candidates who fall short of standards (regardless of race) but are willing to succeed are considered on a case-by-case basis.
|
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Every program does but I don't think that is what is being debated.
Then take off AA if they are equal as you say.
But how can you be sure that there were not more qualified candidates that were pushed aside to admit you?
What case is there? There are always limited resources, spaces, etc, etc. They go to the most qualified. Race, religion, etc, etc are not issues.