Quote:
Originally Posted by mwood
When a reporter goes into a story with a strong political bias the outcome of the story is very predictable. Because this one reporter says levels of violence are the same as they were in 2003 that makes it so? You show your ignorance by parroting everything the liberal media prints. Try thinking for your self and considering the fact there are always two sides to every story/spin. You always come down on the side of the left with no consideration that there may be an agenda. And you call me ignorant.  |
The side of the left? I read various sources and come to the most accurate conclusion I can. You've spent longer explaining why you don't want to read the OP than it would have taken to read it. Perhaps you're concerned about the purity of
your bias.
You know nothing of the man's political bias. The Chron's only full time columnist is conservative Debra Saunders, and she's some kind of winger, I'll tell you.
His piece is not the first time I've heard this info. The other side of the story you refer to has its own bias: the deeply rooted belief that we are the good guys and that if we keep at this long enough, truth, justice, and the American way will come out on top. Heroic mythology first, thinking on one's feet, second.