View Single Post
  #6  
Old 02-18-2009, 02:36 PM
jlomon's Avatar
jlomon jlomon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 310
Quote:
Originally Posted by markham View Post
I know there were several different variations, I have read about them from time to time, and I know that the early ones are generally considered to be problematic. I guess I am wondering if they ever got it right; whether the later 2000+ systems are reliable? I am looking to buy a wagon and I live in Colorado. I certainly don't need AWD all the time, but there are times when my 300D just doesn't cut it. I'd rather not have to deal with the complications of an AWD system, but I don't know if a w210 with traction control and winter mode will suffice, or whether I need to look at a FWD Volvo (Audi and Subaru are not options).
The second generation version of 4Matic (found on W210 and onward) is completely reliable. It is not a reactive system in that you have AWD all the time but it does have the ability to shift power around from wheel to wheel in order to suit conditions. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend the vehicle, providing you have it inspected by a tech who specializes in MB before purchase. That isn't because of the 4Matic, its because it is an MB.

I'm knocking on wood as I say this, but the only problem we've had on our W210 wagon in 2.5 years and 60,000 kms is the accumulators wearing out in the rear hydraulic suspension.
__________________
Jonathan

2011 Mazda2
2000 E320 4Matic Wagon
1994 C280 (retired)
Reply With Quote