Quote:
Originally Posted by Pooka
The union is the only one pushing for more safety so this will not happen again. The companies have not shown a lot of intrest in this area nor has OSHA.
By the way, the CEO did not get fired; he quit in disgust. Imagine; you give people good jobs and just because you kill a few of them they get all huffy.
Who needs that type of aggravation?
The managers who were fired were mid-level types that are easily replaced, and firing a bunch of people looks good in the press. It makes people think you are really trying to do something about a problem.
Like I said before, the Union was recently pushing for more safety in the last contract talks and the companies turned them down flat.
I don't see anyone else trying to improve workplace safety conditions in any industry. Can you name one?
|
OK. So the union is pushing for this, that or the other. What's your point? Mine is they FAILED to get it done or it wouldn't have gotten to court, would it? So, there or not there, what would the difference be?