View Single Post
  #40  
Old 03-29-2009, 06:55 PM
BodhiBenz1987's Avatar
BodhiBenz1987 BodhiBenz1987 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast
Posts: 3,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by strelnik View Post
X 2.
If owners understand that they are legally liable, and homeowners' insurance rates vary based upon dog breed, whether the property has sufficient fences, warnings protections etc to prevent attacks against non-trespassers, then the dog owners will pay attention, because it costs them money and or jail time, plus the potential death of their doggy.

It's called: be responsible for real, or pay the price.
I agree with you, but the sad thing is, most of the people whose pits maul others (I am NOT talking about most people who own pits, by any means! ... just the ones who turn their dogs into violent animals) are the kind of people who have no idea what responsibility is. And even sadder, most of them don't really care that much if the dog ends up dead. They have the dog as a status symbol or to "protect" them. I think the pit bull breed's biggest problem is this: It happens to be very popular with the type of people who shouldn't own animals, any animals. Any breed that is popular with @$$holes is going to end up with a high attack rate. Yeah, when you read report after report, maybe you start to wonder. But anyone who's met a number of pit bulls would have to conclude that it isn't the breed that's the problem ... every pit bull I have ever met has been gentle and sweet, more so than most dogs. To be honest I grew up thinking all pit bulls were awful (that's what my mom always said) ... but meeting several of them changed my tune completely. So it's especially reprehensible that people manage to turn members of this very sweet breed into violent animals. It is unlucky for pit bulls that that element of society happens to like them. I guess the fortunate part is that there are an awful lot of good, responsible people who enjoy them and appreciate them ... and in some cases, give them a second chance. As said, every pit I've personally ever met falls into the latter category.

Just my 2 cents ... one thing that I find particularly depressing is that in cases of aggressive dogs, pit bulls or other, the dogs always end up paying for it. Not only in death, but through their whole life ... no animal should have to be raised in and live in a hateful environment. The owners rarely pay much more than a fine, maybe a little jail time in extreme cases. Why should the owners get so many chances when the dogs don't even get a second chance (or a first chance, really, for that matter)?
__________________
1987 300D, arctic white/palomino--314,000 miles
1978 240D 4-speed, Euro Delivery, light ivory/bamboo--370,000 miles
2005 Jeep Liberty CRD Limited, light khaki/slate--140,000 miles
2018 Chevy Cruze diesel, 6-speed manual, satin steel metallic/kalahari--19,000 miles
1982 Peugeot 505 diesel, 4-speed manual, blue/blue, 130,000 miles
1995 S320, black/parchment--34,000 miles (Dad's car)
Reply With Quote