I guess I missed the point. Where is the objectionable part?
We need to be careful that gun control legislation is not based on fear tactics, but otherwise this all sounds pretty sensible. For example, this part of the article rings true to me:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Txjake
..."The purpose of the report is to identify risk. This is nothing unusual," said Ms. Kuban, who added that the Homeland Security Department did this "to prevent another Tim McVeigh from ever happening again."...
|
We should keep a careful eye out on this sort of statement from the government, but I certainly will not waste my time reading Hedgecock's website. Not a reliable source, IMHO.
EDIT: I stand corrected. After saying I would not consult Hedgecock's website, I took a look and he has linked to the original government report. He is still a knucklehead, but apparently he can be a reliable source from time to time.
