Quote:
Originally Posted by Doktor Bert
But I still find it interesting why Dad's 617.952, which logged 194,000 miles with no thermostat at all, had such minimal cylinder/skirt wear that it could have been re-ringed back to standard.
|
I don't find it odd that the engine had to be removed and tore down with less than 200k miles since it had an improperly setup cooling system.
Quote:
We never had a complaint about a reduction in fuel economy or a power loss either.
|
Thats because customers that take their car to somebody to be repaired rarely keep records of fuel economy and wouldn't notice 2-3mpg less.
Quote:
Since both a 60°C and 85°C thermostat is available, I would suggest the 'correct' device is the one that gives you the most satisfactory heater performance, based on your climatic conditions.
|
"Suggest" all you want, that doesn't make it the correct choice.