View Single Post
  #7  
Old 04-18-2009, 01:22 PM
Shawn T. W. Shawn T. W. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sunsites, AZ
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cr from Texas View Post
What did you learn in class that makes you think a turbo would get worse MPG? Increasing air volume into the cylinder should favor more complete combustion (higher MPG).

Bet I just opened a can of worms!!!

I think you'd be very happy with a 300TD-T (I know, Jimmy will say no such thing - but MB does) with a manual transmission.
It's not the fact that a turbo would get worse mileage, it would be the fact of the larger displacement engine . . .also more air means more FUEL, (= more POWER!) it is not just leaning out the mixture by running a turbo . . .

Is there such an animal as the turbo 300td with a manual tranny?

I believe the MB would be a safer car to be in an accident with, than a VW, also don't know, but . . . the VW has more electronics to go wrong with . . . for safety reason is why we went from a Subaru to Volvo for my wife! (however the electronics on our Volvo would be a nightmare to work on! want to buy it? just don't tell my wife!)

I know there probably doesn't exist the perfect car that is built like a tank and gets 50+ mpg, that is easy to work on and will last forever, and not cost a fortune to own . . .

Last edited by Shawn T. W.; 04-18-2009 at 01:38 PM.
Reply With Quote