View Single Post
  #9  
Old 04-22-2009, 02:05 PM
Jim H Jim H is offline
Geezer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 1,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by helpplease View Post
Most of the grid itself is very old.
Unless it is failing, age is not a reason for an upgrade. Overhead transmission lines don't really wear out. Insulators need to be replaced, but not often.


Quote:
Obviously some updates have been had but for the most part the system has remained unchanged. It is inefficient at best.
what part of the grid do you consider to be so inefficient? Generation? Transmission? Distribution? There's a lot of 'stuff' there that's lumped into this thing we call the Grid.

Quote:
Examples the meter boxes are one way only they only show customer usage but don't alert the company about power outages.
This has little to do with efficiency, and besides, if there is no power at the meter box, how is it supposed to send an alert???

Quote:
The wires themselves I am sure could be better designed.
Umm, wire is wire, how do you design that better??

Quote:
The relay stations seem to be very prone to one goes and then another goes. There has to be something done about that.
Updates can go a long way to prevent these cascading overloads. The trick is to shut off the circuits fast enough that the remaining load is within the generating capacity still online, which is a good trick since the load changes 60 times per second. These failures can cascade FAST!

Quote:
I realize they are privately owned but the problem with that is they are not going to spend anymore money then they have to.
Many of them are publicly owned, and you can buy stock in CON-ED, etc. They have a duty to provide electrical energy at a high reliability and at affordable rates. That means they won't invest a lot in new, unproven technology, and they won't spend $1 to avoid only $0.01 in problems.
Reply With Quote