Please allow me to rephrase my thoughts. this was a charitable event put on for the benefit of girls who were not be able to afford a prom dress.

I can't speak for the other members on this forum, but back in my high school days, if a girl did not have the means to buy a prom dress, she simply wasn't going to attend the prom. the HAVES were able to attend, the HAVE NOTS got to sit home and think about what it might have been like. the black tie, $1000 prom gown and chauffeur driven limousine crowd were not the focus of this event. this charity was attempting to help girls who had a need.

sexual voyeurism against high schools girls of a lower socio-economic class is an affront.