
05-08-2009, 12:54 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,650
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ah-kay
I want to tell members that R134a is comparable to R12 and is good for the environment. What wrong with that?
|
What is wrong with that statement is that it is an ignorant incorrect statement. R134a is not GOOD for the environment.
http://www.r744.com/article.view.php?Id=661
The use of HFC-134a and other synthetic refrigerants may cause more serious environmental damage than previously thought. Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), a decomposition product of R134a, will thus be leached out from the atmosphere by the rain, developing a herbicide effect capable of posing an incalculable risk to plants and other organisms.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-134a
Recently, tetrafluoroethane [R134-a] has been subject to use restrictions due to its theorized contribution to climate change. In the EU, it will be banned as from 2011 in all new cars[1].
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/automotive/speeches_presentations/saalfelden17022006.pdf
Please read the above articles and links to educate yourself and stop posting false information. R134a is not GOOD for the environment. Europe is banning it from all new cars starting in a year and a half because of its contribution to global warming.
__________________
2009 ML320 Bluetec
1985 300CD
1981 300TD

Past Mercedes
1979 300TD
1982 300TD
2000 E320 4Matic Wagon
1998 E430
1984 300SD
1980 300SD
|