[QUOTE=Good enough for ya?[/QUOTE]

No

I'm sure you can read and understand the use of punctuation, like the period for instance!

"In the state of Kansas, there is a doctor, George Tiller, who will execute babies for $5,000 if the mother is depressed. And there are rapists impregnating 10-year-olds who are being protected by abortion clinics."

Most sixth graders could differentiate between that and the original poster's statement:

"O'Reilly likes to go on about how Tiller is aborting fetuses from 10 and 11 year old girls and thus protecting rapists"

The first sentence clearly addresses the late late term abortionist practices, and the second sentence clearly addresses the separate and unrelated allegations having nothing to do with Tiller or his operation of the violation of laws requiring the mandatory reporting of possible child abuse i.e. statutory rape by licensed health care providers working abortion clinics.

Only if you stipulate ab]nd substantiate that Tiller performed late term abortions on 10-11 year olds without complying with the mandatory reporting requirements thereby protecting rapists can the original poster's statement be factual.