View Single Post
  #14  
Old 06-08-2009, 01:32 AM
pawoSD's Avatar
pawoSD pawoSD is offline
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by neanderthal View Post
It does also depend on your driving style though. If you are more of a leadfoot, then you are never going to get good fuel economy.

I do not race everywhere, and tend to drive very economically, like one of those hypermilers; except that i am usually late to wherever I am going. Does not make sense, I know. But most of my driving is on the freeway and I can get a very easy 25mpg with just about every tank in my 2.6. The E320 (1994) will be from 22- 25 mpg. My driving is probably 80% or more freeway. And I choose my routes that way deliberately.

My tires are one size larger, 205/65-15. My speedometer is dead accurate with this tire size on the 2.6. Havent checked on the 3.2.

Remember that the rear end ratio in the wagons and the 2.6 is the same, 3.27. So the different milage can be attributed to the larger engine and wider tires on the wagon.
Interesting....the wagons have a 3.27 diff? Why? For potential towing use?

That could explain it right there why a 2.6 would get around the same or less mpg than the 3.0 M103....as it'd be running higher rpms and sucking more fuel. My 300E seems to run around 2900-3000 or so at 70mph.....

Amazing how much quieter a M103 is at 3000rpm than a 617.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote