|
The RAV I drove was very small inside. It didn't have room for a third row unless it would be rear facing. The transmission would hunt and peck and was never happy and this was in flat Ohio.
It did have a low range if I recall.
My mother's CR-V is a toaster! it has no road feel, the 2.4 litre four is a great engine -- in a Civic. in the heavier CR-V it is too small and needs to have the snot revved out of it to get the car moving. My mother gets 16.7 mpg according to the trip computer!
I loved my 1992 Subbie. It went 290K with no issues before I donated it to the blind. My famil has had three legacies, two Outbacks and a Forrester and has never had a breakdown. My brother, mother, ex-wife, and sister in law all drive or drove them and NONE of them are 'into' car maintenance... I think my ex-wife's 2000 Outback is still on the oil from the last oil change I did to it back in 2000!
The only issue with the Forrester is thatit is a small vehicle. If they are going to drag car seats and 'stuff' around, go for the Outback wagon. At least Subaru still makes a decent station wagon. I still miss mine, but with the Suburban around I could not justify another wagon and I needed the space only a 'burban can provide...
As for timing belts, do them at 55000 miles and you are OK. The flat engines do tend to burn a little oil on startup since oil can collect in the cylinders, but it is negligble and the drivetrains on these cars is bulletproof...
__________________
"I have no convictions ... I blow with the wind, and the prevailing wind happens to be from Vichy"
Current
Monika '74 450 SL
BrownHilda '79 280SL
FoxyCleopatra '99 Chevy Suburban
Scarlett 2014 Jeep Cherokee
Krystal 2004 Volvo S60
Gone
'74 Jeep CJ5
'97 Jeep ZJ Laredo
Rudolf ‘86 300SDL
Bruno '81 300SD
Fritzi '84 BMW
'92 Subaru
'96 Impala SS
'71 Buick GS conv
'67 GTO conv
'63 Corvair conv
'57 Nomad
|