Quote:
Originally Posted by sunedog
No. The problem is there's a pervert stalking her to multiple hotels.
from http://www.abcnews.go.com/GMA/Story?id=8151491&page=2
"The grainy images shot through what appears to be a makeshift hole in a wall, show Andrews undressing and appearing nude in an unknown hotel room, apparently unaware that she is being filmed.
The Web site TMZ.com has viewed several pieces of footage and surmised there are six separate clips circulating online, four filmed at one hotel and two from a second.
According to the site, the first set of videos was filmed through a round hole, and the second set filmed through a jagged hole. There is reportedly different furniture in each of the rooms."
And I apologize for my original inappropriate comments above. This is serious. |
No problem...apology accepted, but not deserved. I just walk into the room when the story manages to be about 1/2 over and for some unexplained reason, the media is using "some shot" that looks like it's coming from across the way from another building, it's being shot at a downward angle and it shows some "chick" walking around inside her "apartment/room" with, maybe, a blouse on and that's it...
If they're using a "generic shot" for this news piece on Ms. Andrews, they're doing their viewers a poor job of reporting the story...altogether.
They're using a "library shot" to tell the story...when in fact, it sounds like (from your POV) that the whole thing was a "peephole" job to begin with. Not some "Shot-Out-The-Window-Across-The-Way" handicam voyeuristic experience...
If that's the case...I think she and her gaggle of attorneys should, seriously, go after the media too...from the standpoint that the media, contrary to what they claim to do, took this lady and presented her story in such a way to imply that she was some sort of window-dressing exhibitionist (Not that that kind of thing is a bad thing!
) but it just shows that the "news" isn't the same thing anymore...it's a tabloid mass of gossip and has nothing in relationship to actually being news...
Maybe, "old-age-related" wasn't what REALLY caused "Uncle Walter" to pass on this past week...it was sheer frustration at the "TMZ-style" of reporting this country has come to expect (and wants!) from our "s-news channels"...
As has been pointed out (Most notably by those same "news outlets" themselves!) ANYONE can get their crap on TV by mere submission...so it just goes to prove the point..."If it's bleeding, it's leading!" is still the low-water benchmark for most of what we watch, see and repeat...
