View Single Post
  #9  
Old 07-08-2002, 01:14 PM
c43amg c43amg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 223
The '97 C36 AMG with the same 5-speed AMG-tuned transmission was 6.2 seconds for 0-60 (gaining 0.2 second over the '96 C36 AMG's 4-speed transmission which was 6.4). See:

http://www.mbusa.com/brand/container.jsp?/overview/overview_engine.jsp&yearModelCode=97_C36&class=97_C&rnav=01234568&subNav=overview&menu=4_0&spec=3

Many folks have been surprised by the relatively small difference between the C36 and C43's performance (tho 0.3 seconds in a 0-60 is defined by Road and Track as "significant") -- the C43 is actually 100 pounds lighter but gains only 26HP and 18 ft/lbs of torque -- a compliment to what a good job AMG did with the C36's I-6 (e.g., compare to that era's 240HP M-3, which did have the advantage of an available manual transmission).

Per the [paraphrased] mantra of Colin Chapman of Lotus: "weight is the greatest enemy of performance and handling".
__________________
'98 C43 AMG
'88 420SEL
'93 190E Limited Edition (including factory Sportline package)
Reply With Quote