Quote:
Originally Posted by compu_85
Again, an argument with no real data to back it up. What's wrong with transverse mounted engines? It makes service easier. It makes engine removal and instillation easier. Is it quite as good in the NVH dept? No, probably not. But I appreciate being able to get at all the sensors, injectors, and transmission linkages easily.
Next thing you're gunna tell me CV axles are a bad idea 
Sorry, the cheapest fully functional transverse mount car I have cost me $180.
-J |
My FWD Audi had the engine mounted it the 'normal' front-rear direction, like a RWD car.
Otherwise, with some transverse FWD designs, especially V6s, space is pretty tight for jobs like timing-belt & waterpump replacement.
At least my '98 Altima has a timng-chain, instead of the belt used on contemporary Camrys and Accords.
And our Benzes do have CV-joints, though being in the rear they tend to last much longer without the stress from having to bend with the steering.
Happy Motoring, Mark