View Single Post
  #21  
Old 03-01-2010, 08:10 PM
777funk's Avatar
777funk 777funk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by babymog View Post
There is little question whether M-B had some quality issues in the mid-late 90s in their design. Whether the V-8 in '94 was also a lesser design than the earlier one I also won't debate.

However.

The '94/'95 E 320 is unchanged in quality from '93, or '91, or '86. The car was nearing the end of production, to be replaced by the 210, and Mercedes didn't spend any money on tooling and engineering to try and cheapen the car at the end of the run. The M104 in the '93-'95 cars was well designed and built, up to '80s M-B standards and left nothing on the table either.

It's my opinion that we should probably try to keep this thread on-subject and answer the OP instead of discussing M-B quality and leadership issues. BTDT as an Engineer and supplier to Mercedes Benz, it's why I'd rather have a 124 than a 210, a 126 than a 140, ... but I'd take any year 124 as long as it wasn't seriously neglected or abused as they're THE SAME QUALITY, except for wire harnesses. Again I have no direct experience in the V-8s and the M104 will give the early V-8s a good run.
Don't the 210s have an M104 series engine (in most of them anyways)?

Is it a different quality engine than the M104 in the W124 car?
__________________
-E300d '99 350k
-Suburban '93 220k
-TDI Jetta '03 350k
Sold
-F250 '96 7.3
-Dodge Ram 12V
-E320 '95 200k
-E320 Wagon 1994 155k
-300d Turbo '87 187k miles
-E320 1994 200k
-300d Turbo '84 245k (sold to Dan62)
-300d Turbo '84 180k
-300sd '80 300k
-7.3 Powerstroke Diesel 15P Van 500k+ miles
-190d '89 Non Turbo 2.5 5cyl 240k (my first MB)
Tom's Imports of Columbia MO Ruined the IP in changing leaky delivery valve O-Rings - Refused to stand behind his work. Mid-MO MB drivers-AVOID Tom's.
Reply With Quote