Yeah, 'cept the MG was a HELL of a lot simpler to take apart. It's like comparing a '69 220D to an '10 SLS AMG when you get into the technicalities on the two cars. I remember Peter Eagan talking about it saying something like almost every part on the Jaguar was bespoke (one of a kind to it's model.) Whereas the MG was a van that used to carry tractor parts which someone lopped the roof off of and successfully turned into a leaky unreliable nightmare. And yet I love British Cars. We're strange aren't we?