|
Thanks, Tjts1
I have a 1989 300E and like the reliability, solidity, and to date relative economy of operation. I understand the 190E to be smaller versions of the W124 and also read that the 1990-93 versions were good cars. I like the smaller size for my daughter. I must admit that the C220's (1996 only) are looking pretty good because I have not yet been able to find a 190 in the condition that I want. Even the later (1999'ish) C230's are becoming cost competitive although I would be more suspicious of a cheaper C230.
At any rate, I have been looking at the 740/940 Volvos because of similar attributes. Cost of good models with up to date maintenance appear a little cheaper to buy but not much. I do like the seats in a Volvo! In fact, I'm looking at a 1994 940 in the next few days. I like the Volvo 850's but I've heard of (and my neighbour will also attest) of frequent electrical problems.
With your experience though, what problems are you having with the 190's that I should be aware of. My 300E has not been without problems over the past 8 years but I have been able to repair economically (water pump, belt tensioner, tune up parts, tires, etc) that I would expect of any car that is 20 years old or so.
Looking forward to your comments!
Thanks,
Paul
__________________
1989 300E
1999 C230 Kompressor
2005 Toyota Highlander AWD
Also owned:
1964 Chevrolet Impala (first car)
1972 Fiat 124 Sport Spider (first sports car)
1976 VW Scirocco (first new car)
1970 Pontiac Parisienne (epitome of bland)
1980 VW Scirocco (last new car)
1953 GMC 6x6 (amazingly well engineered)
1967 Austin Healey 3000
1987 F150 4x4
1978 F150
1987 VW Jetta
1992 Toyota Previa AWD
2003 Toyota Sienna
2001 Nissan Pathfinder 4WD
1949 John Deere Model M
|