Quote:
Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe
*On edit: No they didn't. They won nothing. That's false/untrue information you're claiming.
CONCLUSION
46 "We have considered all of plaintiffs' arguments and, for the foregoing reasons,
we AFFIRM the district court's orders granting summary judgment to Weyco on all of plaintiffs' claims."
I doubted your court case had little, if anything to do with hinging on private property.
In fact I'm certain the court case ruling, (if it's true) has little, IF anything, to do with private property. |
I will have to do more research when I get a break here. It went to at least 1 if not 2 more appeals and the jobs were given back. If I remember the story about the case the reasoning behind the appeals decision was the fact that the cars could not be searched under the 4th amendment. The panel re established the car as a whooly owned peice of private property was not allowed to be searched with out Rresonable cause etc etc etc. And the rights of a corparation as a property owner ended at the INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS of a PROPERTY OWNER.
Again not trying to split hirs but in our last contract the company had to remove that clause from the contract about searching cars. What was put in was letting them know if you had (or the ability) to carry one.
Mostly because of hunting season guys getting off of night shift and heading stright into the field.