Quote:
Originally Posted by Billybob
This is what was said:
Tonkovich is trying to divorce the political views of Brezik from him (Brezik) claiming Brezik was “just a nut” as if he (Brezik) was apolitical. Tonkovich in my view is trying to depoliticize Brezik in part because the political views expressed by Brezik are similar to views expressed on this forum by tonkovich. Tonkovich in my view can’t disassociate his own views from the similar views of Brezik so he is left no alternative but to attempt to separate Brezik from his politic positions. Tonkovich in my view would prefer that Brezik be orphaned from the similar views held by toncovich.
You then made a statement:
To which I responded to you:
And now your complaint is:
I’m not sure I understand the basis of your complaint? Tonkovich is a big boy who is able to express himself, don’t you think?
|
divorce myself? i don't recall marrying the man.
again, you really don't know what i think. "che"? he was a silly dreamer who also enjoyed executing people. why would i be interested in him? (besides, the whole "che" thing was big maybe ten, fifteen, twenty? years ago. which again proves that the "stabber" was more than a little "out of touch". and, seemingly, so are you? what's next, linking "raves" and ecstasy to democrats, socialists and satanic ritual murder? )