Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian77
I owned a 1993 300E several years ago with the 3.2 engine. The 2.8 was an enlarged/reworked version of the 260E engine, while my car was a reworked version of the 3.0 liter 300E engine. Car road like a magic carpet, even much more so, in my opinion, than my w126.
However, I had the head gasket replaced while I owned it (the seepage problem was apparently common on this engine. I don't know whether the head gasket problem applied to the 2.8 engine). Also, the early 90's Mercedes had problems with their evaporators leaking, which would necessitate dash removal. I had this problem, and it cost about $3K to have the dealer replace at the time. Also, the wiring harness was made from recyclable material that prematurely biodegrates. I never had a problem with the wiring harness, but did have electrical issues with the ASR/traction control sensors and the sensor for the alarm in the driver's door lock. Otherwise, the car was a great car. With the car's age, I would also anticipate that the bushings or ball joints on the multilink suspension may need refreshing.
|
Sorry, you are completely mistaken regarding the 2.8 engine. It is an M104, same as the 3.2 engine. (The 2.6 was an M103, same as the 3.0) The 2.8 is essentially identical to the 3.2 mechanically, just a bit less displacement. The 2.8 liter cars have a few options deleted as well, e.g. seat memory is not standard, no headlight washers, etc.
My wife has been driving a '93 2.8 since, er, 2003. It has been a very solid car. Still looks good, still drives good, doesn't need repair too often.