View Single Post
  #6  
Old 10-26-2010, 11:38 AM
deanyel deanyel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,726
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcyuhn View Post
Sorry, you are completely mistaken regarding the 2.8 engine. It is an M104, same as the 3.2 engine. (The 2.6 was an M103, same as the 3.0) The 2.8 is essentially identical to the 3.2 mechanically, just a bit less displacement.
I read the same sentence and would say he is quite correct - in saying that the 2.8 is a larger and reworked version of the 2.6, just as the 3.2 is a larger and reworked version of the 3.0. The suggestion that the 104 is a "reworked" version of the 103 seems OK to me, and not a "complete mistake".
Reply With Quote