View Single Post
  #7  
Old 10-27-2010, 11:52 AM
jcyuhn jcyuhn is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 2,582
Quote:
Originally Posted by deanyel View Post
I read the same sentence and would say he is quite correct - in saying that the 2.8 is a larger and reworked version of the 2.6, just as the 3.2 is a larger and reworked version of the 3.0. The suggestion that the 104 is a "reworked" version of the 103 seems OK to me, and not a "complete mistake".
Ah, I missed the analogy the first time through. I thought he was saying the 2.8 is an M103. It stretches my mind a bit much to call a distributorless, HFM M104 a reworked M103, but I suppose that's a subjective call.

My apologies if my statement sounded a bit harsh.
Reply With Quote