View Single Post
  #63  
Old 12-21-2010, 06:16 PM
kerry kerry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfloriII View Post
Neither the doctrinal note nor the pope's book specifically addressed the situation of condom use by a married couple in which one spouse has HIV.
It's this lacuna that opens the door to reinterpreting traditional moral theology on condoms and HIV. If it's moral for people in a relationship of sex for money to use a condom, it seems incredible to suppose that people with HIV in a loving relationship would be forbidden the same choice.

This opens the door to a discussion of the fact that sex unintended for pregnancy might be moral, contrary to Catholic moral theology.

I'm still curious about your views on sex? Do you agree that only sex intended for pregnancy is moral? Why do you hold the view if you do?
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote