Quote:
Originally Posted by PastorJoe
A very sadenning article.
|
lowered expectations, lowered disappointment. If the pope had wanted to clean house, he wouldn't have done the catholic shuffle and pushed Law into the Vatican. Pretty much the same thing Law did. He'd have fired Law for lying. I mean, if writing false references and pushing the problem to another area isn't lying, what is? He just wanted to sweep the problem under the rug, move the offender away. Cardinals are like princes of the church. If the CEO allows the VP to do silly things, what can we say about the CEO? Fast Forward to today. All the new CEO or Pope does is talk and try to make excuses. He could, if he felt like it, have the Cardinal defrocked or whatever it is they do, right? So, what conclusion can I draw? Besides the fact that they don't always do as they say?