View Single Post
  #1  
Old 01-01-2011, 05:05 PM
dogguy dogguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 244
Question '85 300CD-T: Old Auto. trans. (Bowden) cable vs. new one

I am in the process of replacing the AT kickdown (aka Bowden) cable on my '85 300CD-T (Calif.). The auto. trans. on the car is the 722.416.

I purchased a new AT kickdown cable from Phil and the new one compared to the old one is really different at the transmission end. I have attached two pictures here that compare them. Incidentally, I do have the two black rubber o-rings/seals that fit onto the trans. end of the new cable.

My question: Are the significant and obvious differences between the two cables just a matter of the part being updated/redesigned since the original one was put on the trans. in 1985?

I'd sure appreciate any feedback on this. I'd like to be certain that I have the right part before re-installing the filter, fluid, etc.

Thanks!
Attached Thumbnails
'85 300CD-T: Old Auto. trans. (Bowden) cable vs. new one-trans.-cables-1.jpg   '85 300CD-T: Old Auto. trans. (Bowden) cable vs. new one-trans.-cables-2.jpg  
Reply With Quote