View Single Post
  #15  
Old 03-09-2011, 12:48 AM
cjlipps cjlipps is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NW OKlahoma
Posts: 410
Quote:
Originally Posted by charmalu View Post
I would have no problem using a 240D, no matter where I wanted to go. just plan your time and trip accordingly. sure a 240 in no race horse, it`s only 67 hp, with a low geared differential. 3:69, auto or manual.

I usually drive ours around 60 - 65 on the hwy. and using a GPS, and with some intown and some freeway driving, one tank was 28.18. the next tank freeway and climbing over Hwy 50 (7500 ft) to Nevada, got 28.80. she poops out some at the higher altitudes, so down into 3rd gear.
I do have a 3:58 diff out of a Euro 230E, so gears it up 3%. type of driving I do, i can`t see going up any higher. there is one guy that put in a 3:07, but must live in a flat area, or always going down hill.

I have never driven a 300D, but they are 80hp and a 3:46 Diff.
the 300D turbos are 123 hp with a 3:07 Diff, except for the 85 with a 2:88.

our 85 with the 4-spd picked up a good additional 3 mpg. we get high 28 to 31 + mpg. but that is driving around 3000rpm`s. haven`t checked this one with the GPS yet to confirm my spedo and miles driven.

I guess the bottom line all depends how young you are, and your Testosterone level.

Charlie
I'm the guy that put the 3.07 in a 240D. Before, the car was fine around town and ok up to 60-65. Now it's fine around town and bad from 50-63 but good from 65-75. Still haven't run it in the summer with the a/c but that's bound to hurt the "performance".
Top speed and fuel economy have remained essentially the same.
I would prefer the 300D turbo if I didn't already have a mechanically excellent 240D with a known history.
__________________
1983 M-B 240D-Gone too.
1976 M-B 300D-Departed.

"Good" is the worst enemy of "Great".
Reply With Quote