Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst
The thing about a government is that we don't get to choose which government initiatives we wish to pay for.
In this instance I am neither defending nor attacking the wars.
In either case they were acted on by congress which is the definition of legal in our system of government.
Their constitutionality maybe questionable, but so far nobody has had the standing to bring that suit and those who likely have standing have chosen not to bring suit. Therefore, the legality and constitutionality is unquestioned.
Hopeychange that.
|
But you are attacking Obama, who had nothing to do with the hubris generated Bush wars. And you have supported such wars in the past, so please don't try to wiggle out from under it.
It's just too bad we can't garnish the income of those that supported the wars to help pay for them.