Quote:
Originally Posted by Honus
Then, if he is immunized, the risk of incrimination goes away, the Fifth Amendment becomes irrelevant, and he has to testify or be held in contempt of Congress.
|
Assuming that is the case it raises 2 questions. We are assuming there are other guilty parties besides him, right? That way we can catch the big fish and let the smaller one go? What if the reverse is true? We might be giving the crook a free pass to name a few insignificant things? Further to that, must I accept immunity? IDK.