Quote:
Originally Posted by JollyRoger
Paul is an impossible pick for the RWNJ crowd for his heresies against defense spending. I think they are stupidly blinded by their rigid views, Paul represents a Libertarian revolutionary viewpoint that, if he was elected, would put in place a conceptual view of the COTUS that could essentially destroy the Rooseveltian New Deal revolution. It amazes me that this crowd, like Larry, is so heavily propagandized to vote for The Corporate State faction, that they miss who their truly revolutionary candidate is. Gingrich is simply a continuation of Bush and his failures, but I bet the nuts back him in droves now that the real nuts like Perry and Bachmann and Cain have shown their feet of clay. If Gingrich gets in, he will simply continue the Deal Makers Congress and the entire rotten system that runs this country, as he feeds his suckers trite slogans, right wing hate and hoax emails. Paul, on the other hand, represents a revolutionary break from business as usual, which is why the Right Wing Fascists hate him. For that reason, he might even get my vote if I think the positives of ending the military-industrial complex's stranglehold on this nation could be broken, and that outweighs the negatives of unfettered capitalism, the thing he truly represents.
|
There is one interesting tidbit in this barely legible rambling. It kind if implies that the Repubs are the only ones into deal making. That's one of the funniest things I've read on here in quite awhile.
Also, I'm missing the connection between GW and Newt. Neither one of them was in DC at the same time as the other.
In the midst of Solyndra, GM, the Wall Street and other connections to the Whitehouse, this is quite a hypocritical laugh.