Quote:
Originally Posted by spdrun
If change can't be effected within the framework of the law, it has to be done through other means.
Thus far, the means attempted have been basically non-violent and Constitutional.
Frankly, if someone stole money from you, I WOULD support your attempts to take it back, by means fair or foul. Same goes with power. It has been stolen from the populace by lobbyists and special interests. They're just trying to take it back from those who stole it from them.
|
Sounds dangerous. So at anytime if someone feels disenfranchised what you are saying is that it is ok to do as they please to achieve their goal?
And illegal and inconveniencing others but why quibble over details, right?
So let me understand this. If I felt you stole money from me and I cannot prove it but I know it deep in my heart, you would approve it if I kidnapped your kids and fed one thru the meat grinder to show you I am serious? Then why even bother with a law? If you will only abide by a decision as long as it is in your favor then your support is worthless like a fair weathered friend. What you are basically saying is "As long as you (the court) rules my way, I follow your rulings. When we differ, I will go my own way."