Quote:
Originally Posted by MTI
You do remember that it was hardly an unanimous vote by Democratic Representative or Senators, right?
In the House, Democratic votes were 82 for and 126 against. That's 61% against.
In the Senate, Democratic votes were 29 for and 21 against. 42% against.
Opposition by Republican lawmakers in the House and Senate was less than 3% in both Houses.
|
Irrelevant.
This means in the House there are 82 guilty dems and in the Senate there are 29 guilty dems for that vote. Why was something not done after that? We both know that the war runs on money. Who controls the purse strings controls the war. Further to that, I believe the balance of power shifted after 06. Presidency changed after 08.
Point is, the Dem hands are not pure as the driven snow. But that won't help Chas' rant, will it?