View Single Post
  #22  
Old 02-11-2012, 09:56 AM
cmbdiesel cmbdiesel is offline
Inna-propriate-da-vida
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
Sometimes I feel the same about you...get over yourself and either join the conversation or move on.

Layback has answered the question about Enhanced geothermal quite well...explained the process quite well.

Tell me how the process is much different than fracking for gas. Both have been the causes of localized earthquakes, both have fluids forced at high pressures to further crack the rocks below the surface, yet one has got the treehuggers in an uproar, and the other is a welcomed form of electrical generation.

what's the difference?
Beyond semantic, (which is probably the main difference) it seems like Layback has the right tack, being that the processes are used in different types of rock.
At this point, there exists evidence to suggest that fracking is responsible for a number of environmental issues, hence the uproar.
Hydroshearing, seems to have dodged the environmental stigma so far by not being directly linked to environmental concerns.

Probably another big issue is who uses which term....
Big Oil fracks
Government builds EGS
__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST

1983 300SD - 305000
1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000
1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000

https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif
Reply With Quote