Quote:
Originally Posted by LaRondo
Ok, the media is in for a profit and 1% or less is sufficient for them to call it a day.
Still I am missing the convincing factor to prove the video maker wrong.
I referred to your presentation of common sense, your personal instant response and expression, certainly didn't put any words in your mouth.
To ridicule on subjects of concern leads to the effect of looking ridiculous.
|
Forgive me for using the term "common sense" colloquially. Replace it with "logic" if it has you so up in arms. Jeez, give it up.
So the first 5 minutes (upon which the rest are based) being erroneous or at best least extremely vague and unsubstantiated does not make you question it one bit? You don't see how this impacts the rest of the guy's point? If A is inaccurate, B depends on A, C depends on B, etc. Then C is not going to be accurate either unless it is a fluke. Connect the dots.
Let me also refresh you on something you said just a few posts earlier.
Quote:
|
we need to bow in awe and accept the forwarded data as true and correct.
|
You don't have a background in statistics - fine...but from someone who does, I am asking you to question the logic in the guy's argument since it is not correct. You are refusing to do so and therefore committing the very thing you are accusing me of.