View Single Post
  #1  
Old 04-13-2012, 06:07 PM
anghrist's Avatar
anghrist anghrist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lancaster, CA
Posts: 558
Old Car versus New Car: Philisophical and Cost reasons.

Am I alone in this line of thinking:

I would rather invest money in cleaning up and maintaining my 'old' cars. I get to bug to look at new cars, but I'm no longer tempted to go and shell out $20k or more for a new car.

The old 1977 240D is slow, a bit noisey and smells like the 1970s and a dirty toolbox. The '99 E300 is quick and clean and has only minor cosmetic flaws that can be easily buffed out.

I can work on these cars, or I can take them to decent mechanics and have them repaired without getting my hands dirty. If I ever wish to performance tune them, I can, if I spend the money.

Why would I ever want to buy a new car, that must be maintained almost exclusively by the stealership? Why dump the purchase cash, only to pay even more for maintenance per visit?

I think I will keep driving my 'old' cars... until they are totalled or the cost of repair is astronomically unreasonable.
__________________
2013 Volkswagen Jetta Hybrid SEL Premium (Sparky)
http://badges.fuelly.com/images/smallsig-us/193500.png


It's a car not a science experiment! Open the throttle!
Reply With Quote